|
Worldwide there are several classification
systems of induction motors efficiencies.
In order to create a common system, IEC
(International Electrotechnical Commission)
issued in October 2008 the norm IEC
60034-30 “Rotating electrical machines
– Part 30: Efficiency classes of singlespeed,
three-phase, cage-induction motors
(IE-code)”. It's a classification sytem of
efficiency that replaces the CEMEP one
(to be clear, the one of “Eff.1, Eff.2, ed
Eff.3” motors) and that, furthermore,
recalls a new measuring and calculation
way of efficiency, the one of the norm IEC
60034-2-1 (Rotating electrical machines
– Part 2-1: Standard methods for
determining losses and efficiency from
tests), of September 2007.
In Europe it’s a step ahead in the application
of the Directive 2005/32/CE of 6 July
2005 “establishing a framework for the
setting of ecodesign requirements for
energy-using products”.
It's based on such a normative picture and on that the Regulation (EC) nr 640/2009 of 22 July 2009 that:
- - From June 2011, the motors with efficiency lower than IE-2 will be forbidden
- - From 2015, the minimum efficiency for motors from 7,5 to 375kW will be l'IE-3, and
- - From 2017, the obligation of IE-3 will be extended to the motors from 0,75kW to 5,5kW
To view the new classification and CEMEP classification click here
The following chart tries to synthesize a comparison between yesterday and today.

In our field, we list 5 main changes in
Europe :
- - The classification is now extended to 6
poles motors
- - The powers range is wider
- - In a direct comparison between Eff.2” and
“IE-1” or between “Eff.1” and “IE-2” , we find
that the first, the CEMEP values, are higher,
but this is also a consequence of the
- - Change in the measurement and
calculation system of such values, that must
now be made with the method of the new
norm IEC 60034-2-1:2007, and
- - Introduction of the IE3 "Premium efficiency"
level.
Nevertheless, local legislations of some
Countries inside and outside Europe, and
the specific requirements of some
associations, maintain often incentivized or
even compulsory those motors called “Eff.1”
according to the CEMEP system.
What does Motive do in this scenario?
- - The measuring and calculation system of
Motive motors efficiency is already conform
to the norm 60034-2-1:2007. That's the
one behind the data declared in the probative
test-reports uploaded in motive web-site
(each declared data, we remind it, is in fact
supported, detailed and proven by such
test reports)
- - This, together with the fact that Eff.2
Motive motors are often offering an
efficiency abundantly above the min allowed
level, permits to several Eff.2 Motive motors
to be already classifiable as IE-2 "high
efficiency". Before 2011, anyway, all those
motors that do not yet reach IE-2 efficiency
level will be improved.
- - "Eff.1" motors are already available, and
most of them are already IE3 "premium
efficiency".
- - The test-reports and data truth of eff.1 motive motors has been certified by IMQ, the main Italian certification body for
electrical appliances. The same, in fact,
in September 2008 has firstly inspected
and qualified our internal laboratory
according to the norm IEC/ISO17025, and
then supervised the internal tests on a
sampling list of Eff.1 motors, including some
6 and 8 poles in order to enclose further
values that, out of CEMEP classifications,
were already established by some Countries
laws.
Clients benefits are of many kinds:
BILL EFFECTS
The purchase cost of a motor is about 2-
3% of the total costs of its life. The balance
is energy consumption costs. Comparing
Eff.1 motors to Eff.2, the purchase price
difference is recovered in about one year
of energy saving. Of course, such period
length depends by the specific motor, the
use of it and the local energy costs of each
Country. Motive can give you a tool in xls
format to support you in this calculation.
DURABILITY EFFECTS
Higher efficiency motors heat less, slowing
down the aging cycle of the insulating
materials and living longer. Average
operating life of Eff.2 motive motors is:
- 2500 hours/ year for motors up to 15kW
- 4000 hours/year for bigger motors.
The average life is approximately from 25
to 30.000 hours for the first and 50,000
for the second ones. Eff.1 motors can live
approx 40% longer than Eff.2 motors.
AMBIENT EFFECTS
Electric motors use 65% of all electricity
in industry. Higher efficiency motors have
the further objective of sustainable
development, reduction of CO2 emissions
and consequent improvement of
the quality of the atmosphere with an
objective of sustainable development,
Reduction of CO2 emissions and consequent
improvement of the quality of the
atmosphere.
How to make a more efficient motor?
High efficiency can be seen in many ways:
like the relation between output power and
input absorbed power, or like a measure
of the losses that born when converting
the electric power in mechanical energy.
From another perspective, high efficiency
motors consume less energy to produce
the same torque on the shaft. Basically, an
high efficiency motor is the result of precise
machining, lower frictions, a dynamically
balanced rotor, smaller space between
rotor and stator and of the use of better
materials. The main factors for the design
are based on the choice of the type of
lamination sheets and windings with a
greater turns number and a bigger diameter
wire.
Among all materials that compose a motor,
laminations have the highest influence on
performance.
Motive motors are made with CRNO "FeV"
magnetic lamination sheets, rather than the
customary iron lamination sheets.
Further than raw material, the sheets
thickness is another performance source.
In fact, the thinner is the sheet, the higher
are the performances.
The Semi Processed/Decarb lamination
sheets "Fe P01" can reach up to 1mm
thickness.
FeV magnetic lamination sheets have a
0,5mm maximum thickness.
Composition and thickness give to magnetic
lamination sheets a very low W/Kg loosing
factor:
lower specific losses mean less magnetising
current for the same Power and torque (thus
less heating).
Instead, no standard prescribes a maximum
loosing factor for Fe P01 lamination sheets;
not even this data can be guaranteed. This
is a source of potential performance diversities
between motor and motor.

The main advantages given by the adoption
of silicon magnetic laminations are:
higher efficiency
better guarantees on the quality consistency,
assured by tolerances reported in international
norms. |